Multi-Agent Architectures

Supervisor, Pipeline, Debate & Swarm patterns with architecture diagrams.

When One Agent Isn't Enough

Complex tasks benefit from multiple specialized agents. But "just add more agents" is a recipe for chaos. You must choose the right coordination pattern based on the task structure.

1. Supervisor Pattern

A single "manager" agent receives the user request, plans the subtasks, delegates to specialized worker agents, and aggregates results.

Supervisor Agent ๐Ÿ” Researcher โœ๏ธ Writer ๐Ÿ”ฌ Reviewer Aggregated Result

Best for: Complex orchestration with clear subtask decomposition. Reports, analysis, code generation.

2. Pipeline Pattern

Agents process sequentially. Each agent refines the output of the previous one. Think assembly line.

๐Ÿ“‹ Planner ๐Ÿ’ป Coder ๐Ÿงช Tester ๐Ÿ“ฆ Deployer

Best for: Content creation, CI/CD automation, data processing pipelines.

3. Debate Pattern

Multiple agents argue opposing perspectives and a judge agent selects the best argument. Reduces hallucination through adversarial verification.

Agent A ๐Ÿ‘ "Use RAG" Agent B ๐Ÿ‘Ž "Use Fine-tune" debate โš–๏ธ Judge Agent picks winner

Best for: Fact-checking, risk analysis, decision-making under uncertainty.

4. Swarm Pattern (OpenAI)

Agents self-organize without a central coordinator. Each agent has a handoff() function to transfer control to another agent when the task is outside its scope.

๐Ÿ›’ Sales Agent ๐Ÿ“ฆ Shipping Agent ๐Ÿ’ฐ Refund Agent ๐ŸŽง Support Agent handoff()

Best for: Customer support with departments, triage bots, open-ended workflows.

Which Pattern Should You Use?

PatternControlLatencyWhen to Use
SupervisorCentralizedHigherComplex orchestration with subtask planning
PipelineSequentialPredictableLinear workflows (generate โ†’ review โ†’ publish)
DebateAdversarialHighHigh-stakes decisions, fact verification
SwarmDecentralizedLowDynamic routing, customer support triage

Code Example

OpenAI Swarm pattern โ€” agents with handoff functions.

python
1from openai import OpenAI
2
3client = OpenAI()
4
5AGENTS = {
6    "sales": {
7        "system": "You are a sales agent. If user asks about refunds, handoff to refund_agent.",
8        "tools": ["check_inventory", "process_order"]
9    },
10    "refund": {
11        "system": "You are a refund agent. Process return requests.",
12        "tools": ["lookup_order", "process_refund"]
13    }
14}
15
16def run_agent(agent_name: str, messages: list) -> dict:
17    agent = AGENTS[agent_name]
18    response = client.chat.completions.create(
19        model="gpt-4o",
20        messages=[
21            {"role": "system", "content": agent["system"]},
22            *messages
23        ]
24    )
25    reply = response.choices[0].message.content
26    
27    # Simple handoff detection
28    if "handoff to refund_agent" in reply.lower():
29        print(f"Handoff: {agent_name} -> refund")
30        return run_agent("refund", messages)
31    
32    return {"agent": agent_name, "response": reply}
33
34result = run_agent("sales", [
35    {"role": "user", "content": "I want to return my order #12345"}
36])

Use Cases

Enterprise customer support with specialized department agents
Automated code review with architect, security, and performance agents
Research pipelines that plan, search, analyze, and synthesize
Content workflows (research โ†’ write โ†’ edit โ†’ SEO โ†’ publish)

Common Mistakes

Using multi-agent when a single well-prompted agent would work โ€” start simple first
No maximum iteration limit โ€” agents can loop forever bouncing tasks between each other
Cost explosion: each agent step = API call. A 5-agent pipeline with 3 rounds = 15 LLM calls per request
Agents with overlapping responsibilities causing confusion about who handles what

Interview Insight

Relevance

High - Core system design question at AI-first companies.

AI Tutor

Ask about the topic

Sign in Required

Please sign in to use the AI tutor

Sign In